Mauritania vs Namibia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Mauritania
104.82 1000 No
in 2025
Namibia
96.91 1000 No
in 2025
Mauritania rank
105th
Namibia rank
108th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
0255075100199120082025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 104.82 1000 No against 96.91 1000 No in Namibia, a difference of 7.91 1000 No.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 105th and Namibia ranks 108th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 67.32 1000 No 75.83 1000 No 8.51 1000 No Namibia
2000s 82.85 1000 No 59.36 1000 No 23.49 1000 No Mauritania
2010s 90.36 1000 No 82.91 1000 No 7.46 1000 No Mauritania
2020s 101.37 1000 No 92.12 1000 No 9.25 1000 No Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 104.82 1000 No against 96.91 1000 No in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Mauritania and Namibia?
7.91 1000 No, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Mauritania ranks 105th and Namibia ranks 108th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.