Kenya vs South-eastern Asia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Kenya
5,827 1000 No
in 2025
South-eastern Asia
34,967 1000 No
in 2025
Kenya rank
14th
South-eastern Asia rank
12th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Kenya
  • South-eastern Asia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199120082025

How they compare

South-eastern Asia currently reports 34,967 1000 No against 5,827 1000 No in Kenya, a difference of 29,140 1000 No.

That makes South-eastern Asia's figure about 6.0 times Kenya's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, South-eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 14th and South-eastern Asia ranks 12th of 194 countries.

South-eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya South-eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,485 1000 No 44,044 1000 No 40,559 1000 No South-eastern Asia
2000s 4,590 1000 No 44,485 1000 No 39,895 1000 No South-eastern Asia
2010s 5,441 1000 No 42,812 1000 No 37,371 1000 No South-eastern Asia
2020s 5,598 1000 No 36,138 1000 No 30,540 1000 No South-eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Kenya or South-eastern Asia?
South-eastern Asia, at 34,967 1000 No against 5,827 1000 No in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Kenya and South-eastern Asia?
29,140 1000 No, with South-eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South-eastern Asia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Kenya and South-eastern Asia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Kenya ranks 14th and South-eastern Asia ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs South-eastern Asia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/kenya/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/kenya/south-eastern-asia/">Kenya vs South-eastern Asia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.