French Polynesia vs Malta: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

French Polynesia
0.37 1000 No
in 2025
Malta
0.32 1000 No
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
186th
Malta rank
188th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Malta
0.20.40.6199120082025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.37 1000 No against 0.32 1000 No in Malta, a difference of 0.05 1000 No.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 186th and Malta ranks 188th of 194 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4122 1000 No 0.2967 1000 No 0.1156 1000 No French Polynesia
2000s 0.619 1000 No 0.275 1000 No 0.344 1000 No French Polynesia
2010s 0.503 1000 No 0.268 1000 No 0.235 1000 No French Polynesia
2020s 0.4067 1000 No 0.3517 1000 No 0.055 1000 No French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, French Polynesia or Malta?
French Polynesia, at 0.37 1000 No against 0.32 1000 No in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between French Polynesia and Malta?
0.05 1000 No, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Malta?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and Malta rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
French Polynesia ranks 186th and Malta ranks 188th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Malta: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/french-polynesia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/french-polynesia/malta/">French Polynesia vs Malta: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.