Equatorial Guinea vs Iraq: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Equatorial Guinea
150.63 1000 No
in 2025
Iraq
161.3 1000 No
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
92nd
Iraq rank
91st

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Iraq
50100150200199120082025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 161.3 1000 No against 150.63 1000 No in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 10.67 1000 No.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Iraq ranks 91st of 194 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Iraq Difference Ahead
1990s 53.94 1000 No 121.33 1000 No 67.39 1000 No Iraq
2000s 71.27 1000 No 164.16 1000 No 92.89 1000 No Iraq
2010s 109.63 1000 No 167.93 1000 No 58.29 1000 No Iraq
2020s 139.59 1000 No 155.2 1000 No 15.6 1000 No Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Equatorial Guinea or Iraq?
Iraq, at 161.3 1000 No against 150.63 1000 No in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Equatorial Guinea and Iraq?
10.67 1000 No, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iraq?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Iraq rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Iraq ranks 91st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Iraq: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/equatorial-guinea/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/equatorial-guinea/iraq/">Equatorial Guinea vs Iraq: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.