Ecuador vs Russian Federation: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Ecuador
1,087 1000 No
in 2025
Russian Federation
1,138 1000 No
in 2025
Ecuador rank
42nd
Russian Federation rank
39th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Ecuador
  • Russian Federation
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199120082025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1,138 1000 No against 1,087 1000 No in Ecuador, a difference of 51 1000 No.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 42nd and Russian Federation ranks 39th of 194 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 265.97 1000 No 3,162 1000 No 2,896 1000 No Russian Federation
2000s 532.16 1000 No 2,562 1000 No 2,030 1000 No Russian Federation
2010s 657.05 1000 No 1,745 1000 No 1,088 1000 No Russian Federation
2020s 993.25 1000 No 1,282 1000 No 289.13 1000 No Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Ecuador or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1,138 1000 No against 1,087 1000 No in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Ecuador and Russian Federation?
51 1000 No, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Russian Federation?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Russian Federation rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Russian Federation ranks 39th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Russian Federation: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/ecuador/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/ecuador/russian-federation-2/">Ecuador vs Russian Federation: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.