Central Asia vs Philippines: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Central Asia
2,637 1000 No
in 2025
Philippines
2,819 1000 No
in 2025
Central Asia rank
22nd
Philippines rank
22nd

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Central Asia
  • Philippines
01.0k2.0k3.0k199120082025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 2,819 1000 No against 2,637 1000 No in Central Asia, a difference of 182 1000 No.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central Asia ahead.

Central Asia ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 3,344 1000 No 2,870 1000 No 474.72 1000 No Central Asia
2000s 3,266 1000 No 2,803 1000 No 463.26 1000 No Central Asia
2010s 2,727 1000 No 2,897 1000 No 169.38 1000 No Philippines
2020s 2,621 1000 No 2,784 1000 No 162.88 1000 No Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Central Asia or Philippines?
Philippines, at 2,819 1000 No against 2,637 1000 No in Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Central Asia and Philippines?
182 1000 No, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Philippines?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Central Asia and Philippines rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Central Asia ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Philippines: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/central-asia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/central-asia/philippines/">Central Asia vs Philippines: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.