Central America vs Malawi: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Central America
1,859 1000 No
in 2025
Malawi
2,694 1000 No
in 2025
Central America rank
25th
Malawi rank
23rd

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Central America
  • Malawi
01.0k2.0k3.0k199120082025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2,694 1000 No against 1,859 1000 No in Central America, a difference of 835 1000 No.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Central America's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malawi ahead.

Central America ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 23rd of 32 groups.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1,500 1000 No 1,650 1000 No 149.97 1000 No Malawi
2000s 1,305 1000 No 1,947 1000 No 641.63 1000 No Malawi
2010s 1,428 1000 No 2,041 1000 No 612.89 1000 No Malawi
2020s 1,769 1000 No 2,510 1000 No 740.9 1000 No Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Central America or Malawi?
Malawi, at 2,694 1000 No against 1,859 1000 No in Central America as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Central America and Malawi?
835 1000 No, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Malawi?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Central America and Malawi rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Central America ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs Malawi: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/central-america/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/central-america/malawi/">Central America vs Malawi: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.