Botswana vs Dominican Republic: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Botswana
30.61 1000 No
in 2025
Dominican Republic
27.3 1000 No
in 2025
Botswana rank
134th
Dominican Republic rank
136th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Botswana
  • Dominican Republic
1020304050199120082025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 30.61 1000 No against 27.3 1000 No in Dominican Republic, a difference of 3.31 1000 No.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Botswana ranks 134th and Dominican Republic ranks 136th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Dominican Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 11.38 1000 No 13.87 1000 No 2.49 1000 No Dominican Republic
2000s 24.61 1000 No 13.06 1000 No 11.55 1000 No Botswana
2010s 31.29 1000 No 18.61 1000 No 12.68 1000 No Botswana
2020s 34.43 1000 No 26.3 1000 No 8.13 1000 No Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Botswana or Dominican Republic?
Botswana, at 30.61 1000 No against 27.3 1000 No in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Botswana and Dominican Republic?
3.31 1000 No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Dominican Republic?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Dominican Republic rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Botswana ranks 134th and Dominican Republic ranks 136th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Dominican Republic: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/botswana/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/botswana/dominican-republic/">Botswana vs Dominican Republic: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.