Australia vs Namibia: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Australia
97.67 1000 No
in 2025
Namibia
96.91 1000 No
in 2025
Australia rank
107th
Namibia rank
108th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Australia
  • Namibia
5075100125150199120082025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 97.67 1000 No against 96.91 1000 No in Namibia, a difference of 0.76 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 108th of 194 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 141.52 1000 No 75.83 1000 No 65.69 1000 No Australia
2000s 134.52 1000 No 59.36 1000 No 75.16 1000 No Australia
2010s 104.47 1000 No 82.91 1000 No 21.57 1000 No Australia
2020s 102.23 1000 No 92.12 1000 No 10.11 1000 No Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Australia or Namibia?
Australia, at 97.67 1000 No against 96.91 1000 No in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Australia and Namibia?
0.76 1000 No, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Australia ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 108th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/australia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/australia/namibia/">Australia vs Namibia: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.