Afghanistan vs South Africa: ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female

Afghanistan
358.08 1000 No
in 2025
South Africa
312.13 1000 No
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
73rd
South Africa rank
76th

ILO: ILO Modelled Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO … Female over time

  • Afghanistan
  • South Africa
2004006008001.0k199120082025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 358.08 1000 No against 312.13 1000 No in South Africa, a difference of 45.95 1000 No.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 73rd and South Africa ranks 76th of 194 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 384.52 1000 No 348.74 1000 No 35.78 1000 No Afghanistan
2000s 474.62 1000 No 331.37 1000 No 143.25 1000 No Afghanistan
2010s 698.1 1000 No 263.49 1000 No 434.6 1000 No Afghanistan
2020s 528.05 1000 No 291.13 1000 No 236.91 1000 No Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Afghanistan or South Africa?
Afghanistan, at 358.08 1000 No against 312.13 1000 No in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Afghanistan and South Africa?
45.95 1000 No, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and South Africa rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Afghanistan ranks 73rd and South Africa ranks 76th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/afghanistan/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value/afghanistan/south-africa/">Afghanistan vs South Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.