China, Taiwan Province of vs New Zealand: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

China, Taiwan Province of
-2.3 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Zealand
-2.31 % change on previous year
in 2025
China, Taiwan Province of rank
122nd
New Zealand rank
123rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • New Zealand
-1001020199220082025

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports -2.3 % change on previous year against -2.31 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 122nd and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 193 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9535 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s -1.83 % change on previous year -1.74 % change on previous year 0.0948 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s -1.51 % change on previous year 0.8394 % change on previous year 2.35 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s -2.03 % change on previous year 1.82 % change on previous year 3.85 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, China, Taiwan Province of or New Zealand?
China, Taiwan Province of, at -2.3 % change on previous year against -2.31 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between China, Taiwan Province of and New Zealand?
0.01 % change on previous year, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and New Zealand rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 122nd and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs New Zealand: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-4/china-taiwan-province-of/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-4/china-taiwan-province-of/new-zealand/">China, Taiwan Province of vs New Zealand: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 7,660 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.