Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Rwanda
0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.020.040.06199120072023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0518 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 12.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 164 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0317 1000 No per square kilometre 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0287 1000 No per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0422 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0385 1000 No per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.004 1000 No per square kilometre 0.041 1000 No per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0523 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.048 1000 No per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Rwanda or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Rwanda, at 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.0518 1000 No per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Rwanda ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa/">Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.