Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Mauritius
0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
37th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015199120072023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0139 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0077 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Mauritius ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.