Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Malta
0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
79th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
82nd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Malta
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003199120072023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Malta ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 164 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Malta or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malta, at 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Malta and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Malta ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.