How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Malawi

0.0269 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi rank

6th

Rwanda rank

3rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Malawi
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0269 1000 No per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0295 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 164 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0175 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0317 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0142 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0206 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0422 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0216 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0217 1000 No per square kilometre	0.045 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0233 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0258 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0523 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Malawi or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0269 1000 No per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Malawi and Rwanda?: 0.0295 1000 No per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Malawi ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.