How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jordan?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Iceland

0 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Jordan

0 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

157th

Jordan rank

156th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Iceland
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 1000 No per square kilometre against 0 1000 No per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 157th and Jordan ranks 156th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Iceland
2000s	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Jordan
2010s	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Jordan
2020s	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	0 1000 No per square kilometre	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Iceland or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0 1000 No per square kilometre against 0 1000 No per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Iceland and Jordan?: 0 1000 No per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jordan?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Jordan rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Iceland ranks 157th and Jordan ranks 156th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/iceland/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/iceland/jordan/">Iceland vs Jordan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.