Georgia vs Mauritius: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Georgia
0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
38th
Mauritius rank
40th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Georgia
  • Mauritius
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015199120072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritius ahead.

Georgia ranks 38th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0098 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0138 1000 No per square kilometre 0.004 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.008 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.006 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Georgia or Mauritius?
Georgia, at 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Georgia and Mauritius?
0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritius?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Mauritius rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Georgia ranks 38th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mauritius: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/georgia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/georgia/mauritius/">Georgia vs Mauritius: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.