Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Equatorial Guinea
0.0052 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
37th

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0030.0040.005199120072023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0052 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0052 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.