How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Rwanda?

31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chagai vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO

Chagai

0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2021

Rwanda

0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Chagai rank

1st

Rwanda rank

3rd

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO over time

Chagai
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre in Chagai, a difference of 0.0543 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 26.6 times Chagai's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Chagai ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 1 regions.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chagai	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0317 1000 No per square kilometre	0.028 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0422 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0392 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre	0.045 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0425 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0499 1000 No per square kilometre	0.0478 1000 No per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Chagai or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0564 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre in Chagai as of 2023.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Chagai and Rwanda?: 0.0543 1000 No per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Rwanda?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Chagai and Rwanda rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?: Chagai ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chagai vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/channel-islands/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-female-value-3/channel-islands/rwanda/">Chagai vs Rwanda: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 5,389 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.