Austria vs Belgium: Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Austria
1.1 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Belgium
0.9705 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Austria rank
36th
Belgium rank
39th
Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1.1 An per square kilometre against 0.9705 An per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.1295 An per square kilometre.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Austria ranks 36th and Belgium ranks 39th of 143 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9666 An per square kilometre | 1.06 An per square kilometre | 0.0945 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1.05 An per square kilometre | 1.09 An per square kilometre | 0.0314 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, per square kilometre, Austria or Belgium?
- Austria, at 1.1 An per square kilometre against 0.9705 An per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks, per square kilometre between Austria and Belgium?
- 0.1295 An per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for horses — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Austria ranks 36th and Belgium ranks 39th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Horses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.