Belgium vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Stocks
Horses — Stocks over time
- Belgium
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 29,437 An against 28,160 An in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,277 An.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 209 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32,187 An | 27,500 An | 4,687 An | Belgium |
| 2010s | 32,946 An | 28,048 An | 4,898 An | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, Belgium or Zimbabwe?
- Belgium, at 29,437 An against 28,160 An in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks between Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 1,277 An, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Zimbabwe rank globally for horses — stocks?
- Belgium ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.