Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0029 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Malawi
0.0033 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
114th
Malawi rank
111th

Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malawi
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.010.012196119922024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0033 1000 USD per person against 0.0029 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0004 1000 USD per person.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Malawi ranks 111th of 130 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0047 1000 USD per person 0.0032 1000 USD per person 0.0014 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0071 1000 USD per person 0.0053 1000 USD per person 0.0018 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0087 1000 USD per person 0.0049 1000 USD per person 0.0038 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0096 1000 USD per person 0.005 1000 USD per person 0.0046 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0076 1000 USD per person 0.0046 1000 USD per person 0.003 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0052 1000 USD per person 0.0039 1000 USD per person 0.0012 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0031 1000 USD per person 0.0034 1000 USD per person 0.0004 1000 USD per person Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hen eggs in shell, fresh — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0033 1000 USD per person against 0.0029 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in hen eggs in shell, fresh — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
0.0004 1000 USD per person, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malawi rank globally for hen eggs in shell, fresh — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Malawi ranks 111th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hen-eggs-in-shell-fresh-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hen-eggs-in-shell-fresh-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/malawi/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
131 places, 7,318 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.