China, Taiwan Province of vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation

China, Taiwan Province of
0 t
in 2013
Low Income Food Deficit Countries
0 t
in 2013
China, Taiwan Province of rank
1st
Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank
1st

Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries
-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 1st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 1st of 34 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Low Income Food Deficit Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t -144.44 t 144.44 t China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 0 t 113.5 t 113.5 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1980s 0 t 4.5 t 4.5 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1990s 0 t 12 t 12 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2000s 0 t -0.1 t 0.1 t China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 0 t 0.25 t 0.25 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — stock variation, China, Taiwan Province of or Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 0 t against 0 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — stock variation between China, Taiwan Province of and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
0 t, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank globally for hard fibres, other — stock variation?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 1st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 1st of 34 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-stock-variation/china-taiwan-province-of/low-income-food-deficit-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-stock-variation/china-taiwan-province-of/low-income-food-deficit-countries/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 3,074 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.