C�te d'Ivoire vs China, Taiwan Province of: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation

C�te d'Ivoire
0 t
in 2013
China, Taiwan Province of
0 t
in 2013
C�te d'Ivoire rank
1st
China, Taiwan Province of rank
1st

Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation over time

  • C�te d'Ivoire
  • China, Taiwan Province of
-1.0k-50005001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

C�te d'Ivoire currently reports 0 t against 0 t in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

C�te d'Ivoire ranks 1st and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 1st of 34 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, C�te d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and China, Taiwan Province of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade C�te d'Ivoire China, Taiwan Province of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s -12 t 0 t 12 t China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 12 t 0 t 12 t C�te d'Ivoire
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — stock variation, C�te d'Ivoire or China, Taiwan Province of?
C�te d'Ivoire, at 0 t against 0 t in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — stock variation between C�te d'Ivoire and China, Taiwan Province of?
0 t, with C�te d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for C�te d'Ivoire and China, Taiwan Province of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do C�te d'Ivoire and China, Taiwan Province of rank globally for hard fibres, other — stock variation?
C�te d'Ivoire ranks 1st and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 1st of 34 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

C�te d'Ivoire vs China, Taiwan Province of: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-stock-variation/c-te-d-ivoire/china-taiwan-province-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-stock-variation/c-te-d-ivoire/china-taiwan-province-of/">C�te d'Ivoire vs China, Taiwan Province of: Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 3,074 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.