Northern America vs Sierra Leone: Hard Fibres, Other — Production

Northern America
28,500 t
in 2013
Sierra Leone
9,250 t
in 2013
Northern America rank
12th
Sierra Leone rank
12th

Hard Fibres, Other — Production over time

  • Northern America
  • Sierra Leone
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 28,500 t against 9,250 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 19,250 t.

That makes Northern America's figure about 3.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Northern America ranks 12th and Sierra Leone ranks 12th of 18 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 894.44 t 5,111 t 4,217 t Sierra Leone
1970s 18,080 t 3,785 t 14,295 t Northern America
1980s 52,005 t 4,180 t 47,825 t Northern America
1990s 54,370 t 5,487 t 48,883 t Northern America
2000s 41,780 t 7,661 t 34,119 t Northern America
2010s 28,500 t 8,765 t 19,735 t Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — production, Northern America or Sierra Leone?
Northern America, at 28,500 t against 9,250 t in Sierra Leone as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — production between Northern America and Sierra Leone?
19,250 t, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Sierra Leone?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Northern America and Sierra Leone rank globally for hard fibres, other — production?
Northern America ranks 12th and Sierra Leone ranks 12th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Sierra Leone: Hard Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-production/northern-america/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-production/northern-america/sierra-leone/">Northern America vs Sierra Leone: Hard Fibres, Other — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 3,042 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.