Bangladesh vs Western Africa: Hard Fibres, Other — Production

Bangladesh
10,845 t
in 2013
Western Africa
50,750 t
in 2013
Bangladesh rank
11th
Western Africa rank
10th

Hard Fibres, Other — Production over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Western Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119872013

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 50,750 t against 10,845 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 39,905 t.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 4.7 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 11th and Western Africa ranks 10th of 36 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Western Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Western Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 10,291 t 5,549 t 4,742 t Bangladesh
1970s 8,259 t 3,967 t 4,291 t Bangladesh
1980s 11,198 t 4,182 t 7,016 t Bangladesh
1990s 12,043 t 38,677 t 26,634 t Western Africa
2000s 11,725 t 49,076 t 37,352 t Western Africa
2010s 10,844 t 50,290 t 39,446 t Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — production, Bangladesh or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 50,750 t against 10,845 t in Bangladesh as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — production between Bangladesh and Western Africa?
39,905 t, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Western Africa?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Bangladesh and Western Africa rank globally for hard fibres, other — production?
Bangladesh ranks 11th and Western Africa ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Western Africa: Hard Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-production/bangladesh/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-production/bangladesh/western-africa/">Bangladesh vs Western Africa: Hard Fibres, Other — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 3,042 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.