Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity

Melanesia
435 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
430 t
in 2013
Melanesia rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 435 t against 430 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 5 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Melanesia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 10 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1 t 2.44 t 1.44 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.3 t 463.5 t 463.2 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 5.1 t 12.9 t 7.8 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 78 t 24.5 t 53.5 t Melanesia
2010s 260 t 704 t 444 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — import quantity, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 435 t against 430 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — import quantity between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 t, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for hard fibres, other — import quantity?
Melanesia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.