Melanesia vs Russian Federation: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity

Melanesia
435 t
in 2013
Russian Federation
12,163 t
in 2013
Melanesia rank
4th
Russian Federation rank
7th

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time

  • Melanesia
  • Russian Federation
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119872013

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 12,163 t against 435 t in Melanesia, a difference of 11,728 t.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 28.0 times Melanesia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Melanesia ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 10 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 6.38 t 384.75 t 378.38 t Russian Federation
2000s 78 t 720.9 t 642.9 t Russian Federation
2010s 260 t 5,482 t 5,222 t Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — import quantity, Melanesia or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 12,163 t against 435 t in Melanesia as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — import quantity between Melanesia and Russian Federation?
11,728 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Russian Federation?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Melanesia and Russian Federation rank globally for hard fibres, other — import quantity?
Melanesia ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs Russian Federation: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/melanesia/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/melanesia/russian-federation-2/">Melanesia vs Russian Federation: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.