Madagascar vs Northern America: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity

Madagascar
16,015 t
in 2013
Northern America
948 t
in 2013
Madagascar rank
8th
Northern America rank
17th

Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity over time

  • Madagascar
  • Northern America
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 16,015 t against 948 t in Northern America, a difference of 15,067 t.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 16.9 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Northern America ahead.

Madagascar ranks 8th and Northern America ranks 17th of 97 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Northern America in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 5,104 t 5,104 t Northern America
1970s 0 t 21,766 t 21,766 t Northern America
1980s 1,674 t 53,278 t 51,604 t Northern America
1990s 1,413 t 54,969 t 53,556 t Northern America
2000s 1,421 t 38,551 t 37,130 t Northern America
2010s 11,922 t 820.75 t 11,102 t Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — export quantity, Madagascar or Northern America?
Madagascar, at 16,015 t against 948 t in Northern America as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — export quantity between Madagascar and Northern America?
15,067 t, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Northern America?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Madagascar and Northern America rank globally for hard fibres, other — export quantity?
Madagascar ranks 8th and Northern America ranks 17th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Northern America: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/madagascar/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/madagascar/northern-america/">Madagascar vs Northern America: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 6,522 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.