Least Developed Countries vs Madagascar: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity

Least Developed Countries
19,439 t
in 2013
Madagascar
16,015 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries rank
10th
Madagascar rank
9th

Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Madagascar
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119872013

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 19,439 t against 16,015 t in Madagascar, a difference of 3,424 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Least Developed Countries ahead.

Least Developed Countries ranks 10th and Madagascar ranks 9th of 30 groups.

Least Developed Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 16,845 t 0 t 16,845 t Least Developed Countries
1970s 4,738 t 0 t 4,738 t Least Developed Countries
1980s 2,629 t 1,674 t 954.9 t Least Developed Countries
1990s 1,640 t 1,413 t 226.9 t Least Developed Countries
2000s 1,859 t 1,421 t 437.4 t Least Developed Countries
2010s 14,642 t 11,922 t 2,720 t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — export quantity, Least Developed Countries or Madagascar?
Least Developed Countries, at 19,439 t against 16,015 t in Madagascar as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — export quantity between Least Developed Countries and Madagascar?
3,424 t, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Madagascar?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least Developed Countries and Madagascar rank globally for hard fibres, other — export quantity?
Least Developed Countries ranks 10th and Madagascar ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Madagascar: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/least-developed-countries/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/least-developed-countries/madagascar/">Least Developed Countries vs Madagascar: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 6,522 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.