China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ireland: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity

China, Hong Kong SAR
51 t
in 2013
Ireland
54 t
in 2013
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
32nd
Ireland rank
30th

Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ireland
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 54 t against 51 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 3 t.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 32nd and Ireland ranks 30th of 97 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 5 and Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 209.33 t 776.22 t 566.89 t Ireland
1970s 714.1 t 328.8 t 385.3 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 68 t 20.4 t 47.6 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 474.7 t 29.6 t 445.1 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 451.2 t 0.1 t 451.1 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 90.75 t 13.5 t 77.25 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Ireland?
Ireland, at 54 t against 51 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ireland?
3 t, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ireland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ireland rank globally for hard fibres, other — export quantity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 32nd and Ireland ranks 30th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ireland: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/ireland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ireland: Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 6,522 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.