Indonesia vs Philippines: Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity

Indonesia
-23,808 t
in 2013
Philippines
-23,255 t
in 2013
Indonesia rank
142nd
Philippines rank
141st

Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Indonesia
  • Philippines
-40.0k-20.0k0196119872013

How they compare

Philippines currently reports -23,255 t against -23,808 t in Indonesia, a difference of 553 t.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 142nd and Philippines ranks 141st of 144 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s -1,142 t 4,078 t 5,220 t Philippines
1970s -466.2 t 4,552 t 5,018 t Philippines
1980s -84.2 t 4,481 t 4,565 t Philippines
1990s -408.5 t 3,413 t 3,822 t Philippines
2000s -7,570 t -992.7 t 6,578 t Philippines
2010s -35,894 t -9,683 t 26,210 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity, Indonesia or Philippines?
Philippines, at -23,255 t against -23,808 t in Indonesia as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity between Indonesia and Philippines?
553 t, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Philippines?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Indonesia and Philippines rank globally for hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity?
Indonesia ranks 142nd and Philippines ranks 141st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Philippines: Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-domestic-supply-quantity/indonesia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-domestic-supply-quantity/indonesia/philippines/">Indonesia vs Philippines: Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 8,872 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.