Gabon vs Georgia: Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity
Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity over time
- Gabon
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 141 t against 98 t in Gabon, a difference of 43 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Gabon ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 74th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0.3 t | 0 t | 0.3 t | Gabon |
| 2010s | 24.5 t | 162.5 t | 138 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity, Gabon or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 141 t against 98 t in Gabon as of 2013.
- What is the difference in hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity between Gabon and Georgia?
- 43 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Georgia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Gabon and Georgia rank globally for hard fibres, other — domestic supply quantity?
- Gabon ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 74th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.