Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Groundnuts β Processing
Groundnuts β Processing over time
- Australia
- Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 7 1000 t against 7 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0 1000 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 57th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 57th of 88 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Australia and New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.5 1000 t | 3.5 1000 t | 0 1000 t | β |
| 2020s | 5.25 1000 t | 5.25 1000 t | 0 1000 t | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher groundnuts β processing, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
- Australia, at 7 1000 t against 7 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in groundnuts β processing between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
- 0 1000 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for groundnuts β processing?
- Australia ranks 57th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 57th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Groundnuts β Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.