Bhutan vs Gambia: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Yield, per unit of GDP
Bhutan
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gambia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bhutan rank
10th
Gambia rank
11th
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- Bhutan
- Gambia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Gambia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 10th and Gambia ranks 11th of 102 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — yield, per unit of gdp, Bhutan or Gambia?
- Bhutan, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — yield, per unit of gdp between Bhutan and Gambia?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Gambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Gambia rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Bhutan ranks 10th and Gambia ranks 11th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.