Bhutan vs Ecuador: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Production, per capita
Bhutan
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Ecuador
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
79th
Ecuador rank
76th
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Production, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Bhutan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 79th and Ecuador ranks 76th of 103 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — production, per capita, Bhutan or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — production, per capita between Bhutan and Ecuador?
- 0 t per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Ecuador rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — production, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 79th and Ecuador ranks 76th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.