Ghana vs India: Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I

Ghana
2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
8th
India rank
7th

Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I over time

  • Ghana
  • India
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

Ghana ranks 8th and India ranks 7th of 103 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1970s 0.3405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1980s 0.5048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1990s 0.4724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
2000s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
2010s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
2020s 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant), Ghana or India?
India, at 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant) between Ghana and India?
0.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and India rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant)?
Ghana ranks 8th and India ranks 7th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs India: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/ghana/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/ghana/india/">Ghana vs India: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 5,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.