Gambia vs Malawi: Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I

Gambia
4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
2nd
Malawi rank
4th

Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I over time

  • Gambia
  • Malawi
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 4th of 103 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 8.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 9.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 7.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 5.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 7.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 5.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 3.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant), Gambia or Malawi?
Gambia, at 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant) between Gambia and Malawi?
0.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Malawi rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant)?
Gambia ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 4th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Malawi: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/gambia-the/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/gambia-the/malawi/">Gambia vs Malawi: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 5,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.