Chad vs Rwanda: Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I

Chad
0.4496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.3871 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
24th
Rwanda rank
26th

Groundnuts, excluding: Gross Production Value … square kilometre I over time

  • Chad
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.4496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3871 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 103 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.2542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.5148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant), Chad or Rwanda?
Chad, at 0.4496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3871 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant) between Chad and Rwanda?
0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Rwanda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Rwanda rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — gross production value (constant)?
Chad ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Rwanda: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/chad/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/groundnuts-excluding-shelled-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-2/chad/rwanda/">Chad vs Rwanda: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 5,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.