Jordan vs Kazakhstan: Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Area harvested, per capita (Area)
Jordan
0 ha per person
in 2014
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
102nd
Kazakhstan rank
99th
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Area harvested, per capita (Area) over time
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jordan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 102nd and Kazakhstan ranks 99th of 103 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher groundnuts, excluding shelled — area harvested, per capita, Jordan or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in groundnuts, excluding shelled — area harvested, per capita between Jordan and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and Kazakhstan rank globally for groundnuts, excluding shelled — area harvested, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 102nd and Kazakhstan ranks 99th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.