Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Gross non-food production index

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
107.76 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Mozambique
108.43 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
24th
Mozambique rank
23rd

Gross non-food production index over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Mozambique
0100200300196119862011

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 108.43 1999-2001 = 100 against 107.76 1999-2001 = 100 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.67 1999-2001 = 100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 24th and Mozambique ranks 23rd of 51 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 220.9 1999-2001 = 100 47.21 1999-2001 = 100 173.69 1999-2001 = 100 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1970s 256.32 1999-2001 = 100 42.63 1999-2001 = 100 213.69 1999-2001 = 100 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1980s 244.78 1999-2001 = 100 19.04 1999-2001 = 100 225.73 1999-2001 = 100 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1990s 182.78 1999-2001 = 100 21.91 1999-2001 = 100 160.88 1999-2001 = 100 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2000s 102.31 1999-2001 = 100 85.46 1999-2001 = 100 16.85 1999-2001 = 100 Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 105.97 1999-2001 = 100 108.42 1999-2001 = 100 2.45 1999-2001 = 100 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross non-food production index, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 108.43 1999-2001 = 100 against 107.76 1999-2001 = 100 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross non-food production index between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique?
0.67 1999-2001 = 100, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique rank globally for gross non-food production index?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 24th and Mozambique ranks 23rd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files, published as Gross non-food production index (1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Gross non-food production index. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gross-non-food-production-index-1999-2001-100/congo-dem-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gross-non-food-production-index-1999-2001-100/congo-dem-rep/mozambique/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Gross non-food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross non-food production index (1999-2001 = 100)
Unit
1999-2001 = 100
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 2,578 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

Non-food production index covers non-food items. The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed.