Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Grapefruit and products — Food supply

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
18,894 million Kcal
in 2023
South Africa
24,881 million Kcal
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
21st
South Africa rank
8th

Grapefruit and products — Food supply over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k201020162023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 24,881 million Kcal against 18,894 million Kcal in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 5,987 million Kcal.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 8th of 29 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 19,841 million Kcal 24,096 million Kcal 4,255 million Kcal South Africa
2020s 22,214 million Kcal 14,424 million Kcal 7,790 million Kcal Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grapefruit and products — food supply, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 24,881 million Kcal against 18,894 million Kcal in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in grapefruit and products — food supply between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
5,987 million Kcal, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for grapefruit and products — food supply?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 8th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grapefruit and products — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Grapefruit and products — Food supply. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/grapefruit-and-products-food-supply-kcal/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/grapefruit-and-products-food-supply-kcal/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Grapefruit and products — Food supply</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grapefruit and products — Food supply (kcal)
Unit
million Kcal
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 2,838 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.