Nicaragua vs Poland: Goats — Stocks, per capita
Nicaragua
0.0012 An per person
in 2023
Poland
0.0017 An per person
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
154th
Poland rank
151st
Goats — Stocks, per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.0017 An per person against 0.0012 An per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0005 An per person.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.5 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 154th and Poland ranks 151st of 162 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0013 An per person | 0.0049 An per person | 0.0036 An per person | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.0013 An per person | 0.0042 An per person | 0.0029 An per person | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.0012 An per person | 0.0019 An per person | 0.0007 An per person | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.0012 An per person | 0.0015 An per person | 0.0003 An per person | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goats — stocks, per capita, Nicaragua or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.0017 An per person against 0.0012 An per person in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in goats — stocks, per capita between Nicaragua and Poland?
- 0.0005 An per person, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Poland rank globally for goats — stocks, per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 154th and Poland ranks 151st of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goats — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goats — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.