Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate

Australia
30.59 % change on previous year
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
3.56 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia rank
2nd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
5th

Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0200400600800196219932024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 30.59 % change on previous year against 3.56 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 27.03 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia's figure about 8.6 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 3.1 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year 1.51 % change on previous year Australia
1970s 3.75 % change on previous year 1.78 % change on previous year 1.98 % change on previous year Australia
1980s 97.02 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 94.73 % change on previous year Australia
1990s 2.58 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year 0.757 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 9.25 % change on previous year 2.57 % change on previous year 6.68 % change on previous year Australia
2010s 1.45 % change on previous year 3.71 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 7.68 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year 5.62 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goats — stocks, annual growth rate, Australia or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia, at 30.59 % change on previous year against 3.56 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in goats — stocks, annual growth rate between Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
27.03 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for goats — stocks, annual growth rate?
Australia ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/goats-stocks-annual-growth-rate/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/goats-stocks-annual-growth-rate/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 13,006 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Goats — Stocks. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.