Germany vs Luxembourg: Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP
Germany
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Germany rank
140th
Luxembourg rank
142nd
Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Germany
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.7 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Germany ranks 140th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 145 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp, Germany or Luxembourg?
- Germany, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2017.
- What is the difference in goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp between Germany and Luxembourg?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Luxembourg?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Germany and Luxembourg rank globally for goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp?
- Germany ranks 140th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goat fat, unrendered — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.