Belgium vs Colombia: Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Colombia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
135th
Colombia rank
134th
Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 135th and Colombia ranks 134th of 145 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Colombia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Colombia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Colombia rank globally for goat fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 135th and Colombia ranks 134th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goat fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goat fat, unrendered — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.