Thailand vs Zambia: Has the world passed peak agricultural land?

Thailand
17.71 million
in 2010
Zambia
16.98 million
in 2010
Thailand rank
48th
Zambia rank
49th

Has the world passed peak agricultural land? over time

  • Thailand
  • Zambia
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M178018952010

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 17.71 million against 16.98 million in Zambia, a difference of 732,900.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1780 it was Zambia ahead.

Thailand ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 49th of 179 countries.

Across the 24 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 20.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Zambia Difference Ahead
1780s 553,304 2.22 million 1.67 million Zambia
1790s 585,537 2.30 million 1.72 million Zambia
1800s 619,411 2.39 million 1.77 million Zambia
1810s 690,907 2.48 million 1.79 million Zambia
1820s 765,848 2.65 million 1.88 million Zambia
1830s 844,989 2.83 million 1.98 million Zambia
1840s 929,837 3.02 million 2.09 million Zambia
1850s 1.35 million 3.24 million 1.89 million Zambia
1860s 1.49 million 3.46 million 1.98 million Zambia
1870s 1.65 million 3.90 million 2.25 million Zambia
1880s 1.82 million 4.39 million 2.57 million Zambia
1890s 2.30 million 4.95 million 2.65 million Zambia
1900s 2.78 million 5.57 million 2.79 million Zambia
1910s 3.24 million 6.95 million 3.72 million Zambia
1920s 3.72 million 8.66 million 4.94 million Zambia
1930s 5.09 million 10.78 million 5.69 million Zambia
1940s 6.48 million 13.46 million 6.98 million Zambia
1950s 7.85 million 16.60 million 8.75 million Zambia
1960s 10.87 million 20.48 million 9.61 million Zambia
1970s 13.07 million 14.34 million 1.27 million Zambia
1980s 16.92 million 14.32 million 2.60 million Thailand
1990s 18.58 million 14.65 million 3.93 million Thailand
2000s 18.18 million 15.76 million 2.41 million Thailand
2010s 17.71 million 16.98 million 732,900 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher has the world passed peak agricultural land?, Thailand or Zambia?
Thailand, at 17.71 million against 16.98 million in Zambia as of 2010.
What is the difference in has the world passed peak agricultural land? between Thailand and Zambia?
732,900, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zambia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
How do Thailand and Zambia rank globally for has the world passed peak agricultural land??
Thailand ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 49th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Has the world passed peak agricultural land?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zambia: Has the world passed peak agricultural land?. Statizoid, drawing on Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-peak-agricultural-land/thailand/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-peak-agricultural-land/thailand/zambia/">Thailand vs Zambia: Has the world passed peak agricultural land?</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Has the world passed peak agricultural land?
Source
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,296 data points, 1780–2010
Last refreshed

Agricultural land is the sum of cropland and pasture used for grazing livestock. This is shown for three sources, which use different methods of estimation. While they disagree on how much land is used for agriculture, and the exact date that it peaked, they do all agree that we have passed the peak.