Central African Republic vs Lesotho: Global meat production, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.3068 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Lesotho
0.2911 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
175th
Lesotho rank
177th

Global meat production, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Lesotho
00.20.40.60.8196119922024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.3068 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.2911 tonnes per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0157 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 175th and Lesotho ranks 177th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0497 tonnes per square kilometre 0.5213 tonnes per square kilometre 0.4716 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 0.0665 tonnes per square kilometre 0.6669 tonnes per square kilometre 0.6004 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0948 tonnes per square kilometre 0.835 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7402 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 0.1412 tonnes per square kilometre 0.332 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1907 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 0.2103 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3318 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1215 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 0.278 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3215 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0435 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.3013 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2977 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0037 tonnes per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global meat production, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Lesotho?
Central African Republic, at 0.3068 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.2911 tonnes per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2024.
What is the difference in global meat production, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Lesotho?
0.0157 tonnes per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Lesotho?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Lesotho rank globally for global meat production, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Lesotho ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global meat production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Lesotho: Global meat production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-meat-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-meat-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/lesotho/">Central African Republic vs Lesotho: Global meat production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global meat production, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,357 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global meat production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.