Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Global meat production, per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.1194 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo
0.113 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Bhutan rank
189th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
190th

Global meat production, per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.1194 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.113 tonnes per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0064 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Bhutan ranks 189th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0755 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0731 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0024 tonnes per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.0972 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0762 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0209 tonnes per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.1334 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0822 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0512 tonnes per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0644 tonnes per square kilometre 0.094 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0296 tonnes per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0.0501 tonnes per square kilometre 0.095 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0449 tonnes per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0.0736 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1044 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0308 tonnes per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0.1144 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1107 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0037 tonnes per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global meat production, per square kilometre, Bhutan or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Bhutan, at 0.1194 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.113 tonnes per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in global meat production, per square kilometre between Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.0064 tonnes per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for global meat production, per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 189th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global meat production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Global meat production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-meat-production-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-meat-production-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-dem-rep/">Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Global meat production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global meat production, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,357 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global meat production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.