Romania vs Saudi Arabia: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

Romania
0.1916 tonnes
in 2015
Saudi Arabia
0.412 tonnes
in 2015
Romania rank
68th
Saudi Arabia rank
67th

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • Romania
  • Saudi Arabia
050100150200250195019822015

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.412 tonnes against 0.1916 tonnes in Romania, a difference of 0.2204 tonnes.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 2.2 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 67th of 69 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1950s 4.68 tonnes 1.91 tonnes 2.77 tonnes Romania
1960s 30.45 tonnes 4.52 tonnes 25.93 tonnes Romania
1970s 146.18 tonnes 5.57 tonnes 140.61 tonnes Romania
1980s 145 tonnes 10.28 tonnes 134.71 tonnes Romania
1990s 48.84 tonnes 13.68 tonnes 35.17 tonnes Romania
2000s 33.26 tonnes 0.567 tonnes 32.7 tonnes Romania
2010s 6.73 tonnes 0.4106 tonnes 6.32 tonnes Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, Romania or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.412 tonnes against 0.1916 tonnes in Romania as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between Romania and Saudi Arabia?
0.2204 tonnes, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Saudi Arabia?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do Romania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
Romania ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 67th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Saudi Arabia: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/romania/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/romania/saudi-arabia/">Romania vs Saudi Arabia: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.